Threshold Increase: Programs qualified as Type A programs in past years if they entailed expenses of $750,000 or more. The cutoff for a Type A program now is $1,000,000 for entities with total government awards of less than $25 million.
Type A vs. Type B Programs: Type A programs are major federal financing initiatives needing audits at least once every three years; Type B programs have less auditing requirements. This difference is important since Type A programs usually have more financial risk and so demand more exacting inspection.
Audit Implications: By lowering the frequency of necessary audits, this move mostly helps smaller organizations—those with government awards less than $25 million. Previously meeting the $750,000 threshold programs might now be excluded, therefore saving time and money.
Impact on Larger Entities: The Type A program threshold is computed as 3% of the total federal awards spent for entities whose overall federal expenditures exceed $25 million. This guarantees that audit criteria stay commensurate with the federal assistance received, therefore preserving strict control where more taxpayer money is engaged. An organization with $30 million in federal grants, for example, would have to audit programs reaching the 3% level, or $900,000.
A nonprofit running multiple government grants totaling less than $25 million would suddenly find less programs classified as Type A. Less required audits as a result translate to resources freed for other program activities. For larger companies, including state agencies, the 3% level guarantees that important government programs are routinely reviewed, therefore preserving responsibility.
To give an example, a nonprofit organization that received $20 million in federal funding would see a change in the amount of Type A programs tested. Before the change, any program that had a total of $750 thousand in expenditures would be tested as Type A. After the change, the threshold is $1 million which would result in less testing and therefore a less rigorous audit.
While keeping necessary control for bigger federal cash recipients, these improvements let smaller organizations save on compliance expenses. The OMB hopes to reconcile efficient compliance with cost control by lowering audit responsibilities for smaller projects.